Proposed artifact renaming makes sense to me, even if I prefer a 3-part
name max.
We can simply target this for beta2.
TKs,
- Eric
On 16/06/11 09:33, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Norman Maurer<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
I don't have big preferences here. I just would like to get beta1 released
soon. And every "change" will block us more, so I'm more concerned about
JAMES-1269 a lot more then about name changes etc.
I'm working on that now but I'm concerned that until we have an
automated integrated system, maintenance is going to be a major issue
Robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
