Can you just point me to the JIRA that you consider as ready. Thx, Eric On 04/13/2015 02:56 PM, Benoit Tellier wrote: > Hi, > > I just uploaded a patch for Mailbox-155 . > > I will apply a patch for Mailbox-217 , MAILBOX-220 and MAILBOX-215 tommorow. > > I will soon attach patch for MAILBOX-211 ( distributed mailbox event > system based on Kafka and possibly (if needed) ZooKeeper ). > > We will rework Cassandra related issue in java 8 before integrating it > in James. > > On 04/13/15 14:31, Matthieu Baechler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Le 11/04/2015 19:01, Eric Charles a �crit : >>> See answers in line >>> >>> On 04/09/2015 10:38 AM, Matthieu Baechler wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I work for an free software company, Linagora, and with my team, we >>>> are working to have James fit our needs. >>>> Two of our interns already submitted some code regarding Cassandra >>>> support and some bugfixes on James itself (Philippe Benoit and >>>> Benoit Tellier). >>>> We are making our team bigger and have multiple goals that I'd like >>>> to share with you: >>>> 1. have James 3.0 released ! >>>> 2. writing backends to run James on Cassandra/ElasticSearch/Kafka >>>> 3. write some mailet or other extensions to match our products >>>> functional needs >>>> >>> Great! >>> >>> Could you list the opened jira with contributions? I will review and >>> commit. >> Benoit Tellier will reply to this mail to list his waiting contributions. >> >> I've just created MAILBOX-221 and MAILBOX-222 to bring the changes >> about jdk versions. >> >>>> So we are currently working to contribute all the code we wrote for >>>> goal 2. >>>> >>>> In this regard, I'd like to know several things : >>>> >>>> - I see in james-parent 1.8.3-SNAPSHOT that James targets java 6. >>>> What about pushing it to java 7 now that Java 6 is end-of-life ? >>>> >>> It would be better to release 3.0.0 on java 6 and migrate to java 7 >>> for the next release. >> Great, let's do this. MAILBOX-221 will enforce this (for mailbox). >>>> - is it acceptable to contribute backends that require java 8 (with >>>> some magic to disable build if java < 8). We would really like >>>> writing modern Java for our modules ! >>>> >>> Sure, but it would be released for 3.0.0+ >>> jdk7 or jdk8 will be subject to discussion. >> See MAILBOX-222 then. >>>> - Could James projet make use of apache integration >>>> (https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and) >>>> with github to accept contributions ? I know some others apache >>>> projects amend their contribution guidelines to make it possible ( >>>> https://mahout.apache.org/developers/github.html ). We could just >>>> import their practices into James, don't you think ? >>>> >>> +1 >>> >> I've just tried this github integration and it seems to work (it adds >> a comment into related ticket). Where do you want we document this >> process ? >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
