[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16871037#comment-16871037 ]
Tellier Benoit commented on JAMES-2805: --------------------------------------- - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2806 intend to allow the BlobStore caller to specify a bucketName > Top level implementation of the DeletedMessageVault > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JAMES-2805 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2805 > Project: James Server > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Tellier Benoit > Priority: Major > > While working on the deletedMessageVault, we targeted in MAILBOX-381 a first > implementation on top of MailRepositories > That decision was unfortunate as then one can browse the content of the > deletedMessageVault vault through webAdmin. > Thus we decided to implement DeletedMessageVault as a separate component. > That component has the following considerations: > - Should have a low storage cost > - Cold storage and delays upon reads are acceptable as one does not expect a > restore/export to be fast > - Find an efficient way to implement retention (deleting too old emails) > without a full scan > We decided to provide an implementation above the blobStore and a metaData > store (cassandra) > Retention will be implemented with object storage buckets (one month = 1 > bucket). We could then simply delete a bucket when all the mails it contains > are older than the retention period. > Querying the deleteMessageVault will first be done with a full scan. Later > enhancement can be done by providing a per-bucket (immutable) Lucene index - > once the bucket is no longer the latest one. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org