On 16/09/2019 15:38, Matthieu Baechler wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 10:19 +0700, Tellier Benoit wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> [...] >> >> What would you think of such an approach? >> > > There's a small detail that bothers me: in the past, relying for too > long on in-memory only made the implementation of a persistent backend > harder because most of the time, problems were hidden by the fact we keep > instances of object in memory instead of having different instances. > > I would suggest, if we go that way, to use persistent datastructure > (such as the ones found in vavr) and always deep-copy objects at the > managers/mappers boundary. > > WDYT?
Could you provide an example for this for data-jmap memory? It would help making the proposal clearer, in my opinion. Regards, Benoit --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
