[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

René Cordier updated JAMES-3142:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
*Problem:*

Given a running James cluster configured with additional listenerA When I do a 
rolling configuration change to remove listenerA Then James keeps posting 
events in the queue corresponding to listenerA without consuming it \{code}

To summarize we can not remove additional listeners properly even with a 
restart.

Impact: the queue keeps growing indefinitly eventually causing a rabbitMQ 
failure.

This happened on UPN when we tried removing the SpamAssassin listener.

*Solution*

James could be sanitizing existing bindings upon start (removing the extra 
ones) but I'm worry about uneven configuration clusters. (serverA have the 
additional listener, not serverB)

  was:
*Problem:*
{code:java}
 {code}
Given a running James cluster configured with additional listenerA When I do a 
rolling configuration change to remove listenerA Then James keeps posting 
events in the queue corresponding to listenerA without consuming it \{code}

To summarize we can not remove additional listeners properly even with a 
restart.

Impact: the queue keeps growing indefinitly eventually causing a rabbitMQ 
failure.

This happened on UPN when we tried removing the SpamAssassin listener.

*Solution*

James could be sanitizing existing bindings upon start (removing the extra 
ones) but I'm worry about uneven configuration clusters. (serverA have the 
additional listener, not serverB)


> Removing an additional mailbox listener
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JAMES-3142
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3142
>             Project: James Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: René Cordier
>            Priority: Major
>
> *Problem:*
> Given a running James cluster configured with additional listenerA When I do 
> a rolling configuration change to remove listenerA Then James keeps posting 
> events in the queue corresponding to listenerA without consuming it \{code}
> To summarize we can not remove additional listeners properly even with a 
> restart.
> Impact: the queue keeps growing indefinitly eventually causing a rabbitMQ 
> failure.
> This happened on UPN when we tried removing the SpamAssassin listener.
> *Solution*
> James could be sanitizing existing bindings upon start (removing the extra 
> ones) but I'm worry about uneven configuration clusters. (serverA have the 
> additional listener, not serverB)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to