[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17140104#comment-17140104
]
Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3230:
---------------------------------------
Yes I agree.
There is so far no JPA support for JMAP anyway. Hence this configuration file
makes little sense in the first place.
To be exposed on the basic server we would need JPA support, & a final RFC-8621
JMAP implementation (& not today draft)
> Clarify JMAP Configuration (jmap.properties)
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-3230
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3230
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: David Leangen
> Priority: Major
>
> In the context of the *Basic Server*, determine if (1) this configuration is
> necessary, and if so (2) how can we minimize it and (3) document it better.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
