[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17153181#comment-17153181
 ] 

René Cordier commented on JAMES-3295:
-------------------------------------

[https://github.com/linagora/james-project/pull/3543] introduced integration 
tests to demonstrate the issues

> Integration tests : SMTP out - retry back off leveraging MailRepositrories 
> and reprocessing
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JAMES-3295
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3295
>             Project: James Server
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Queue, rabbitmq, Remote Delivery, tests
>            Reporter: Benoit Tellier
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: aca6e77b-c720-42a2-b78e-0e74d77aa424.png
>
>
> *Context*
> Distributed James do not support MailQueue delays making it unusable as a MX 
> server.
> However given a fixed network of suppliers to work with, delays are not an 
> issues, SMTP error just need to be correctly handled.
> retrying without delay could enhance the situation by working around some 
> transient remote server errors. It’s better than not retrying at all (or 
> doing all the retries without delays).
> Given manual intervention, it is possible to correctly 
> *Requirements*
> Such a solution should:
>  - Attempt delivery a single time
>  - Store transient and permanent failure in different mail repository
>  - After a given number of tries, transient failures should be considered 
> permanent
> *Definition of done*
> Write potentially failing mailet integration tests demonstrating the above 
> proposed RemoteDelivery error handling.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to