Benoit Tellier created JAMES-3696: ------------------------------------- Summary: Solve instable test for the pulsar mail queue Key: JAMES-3696 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3696 Project: James Server Issue Type: Sub-task Components: pulsar, Queue Affects Versions: master Reporter: Benoit Tellier
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/james/job/ApacheJames/job/PR-826/7/ Pulsar mail queue bringed in some unstable tests {code:java} Test Result (4 failures / +4) org.apache.james.queue.pulsar.PulsarMailQueueTest.removeByRecipientShouldRemoveSpecificEmail org.apache.james.queue.pulsar.PulsarMailQueueTest.removeByRecipientShouldRemoveSpecificEmailWhenMultipleRecipients{List, MailAddress}[5] org.apache.james.queue.pulsar.PulsarMailQueueTest.removeByRecipientShouldRemoveSpecificEmailWhenMultipleRecipients{List, MailAddress}[6] org.apache.james.queue.pulsar.PulsarMailQueueTest.removeShouldRemoveMailFromStoreWhenFilteredOut {code} Looking at the first, some email expected to be deleted were not: {code:java} Error Message Expecting actual: ["name1", "name2"] to contain exactly (and in same order): ["name1"] but some elements were not expected: ["name2"] {code} Maybe because propagation of the delete filter is asynchronous? (IE the client delete returns when enqueuing the filter but without any warranty so as when it would be dequeued and applied). If so this isa design flaw and I hardly see how to improve that . Or we add a delay in the tests to relax the consistency guaranty? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org