[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ouvtam updated JAMES-3848:
--------------------------
Description:
While working on JAMES-3841 I stumbled upon blocking code that might need some
investigation.
When calling ActiveMQMessageConsumer#receive(timeout) it blocks until a new
message is received when prefetchSize is zero (see
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageConsumer#receive) even when a timeout is
given. That would explain some observed timeouts in disabled tests in the test
package org.apache.james.queue.activemq.
One way to mitigate this is to set prefetch size greater than zero to make the
timeout occur. But this would also mean that code that relies on blocking
dequeues must be rewritten.
What do you think?
was:
While working on JAMES-3841 I stumbled upon blocking code that might be
investigated.
When calling ActiveMQMessageConsumer#receive(timeout) it blocks until a new
message is received when prefetchSize is zero (see
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageConsumer#receive) even when a timeout is
given. That would explain some observed timeouts in disabled tests in the test
package org.apache.james.queue.activemq.
One way to mitigate this is to set prefetch size greater than zero to make the
timeout occur. But this would also mean that code that relies on blocking
dequeues must be rewritten.
What do you think?
> ActiveMQ dequeuing can block (infinite timeout)
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-3848
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3848
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Queue
> Reporter: ouvtam
> Priority: Minor
>
> While working on JAMES-3841 I stumbled upon blocking code that might need
> some investigation.
> When calling ActiveMQMessageConsumer#receive(timeout) it blocks until a new
> message is received when prefetchSize is zero (see
> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageConsumer#receive) even when a timeout is
> given. That would explain some observed timeouts in disabled tests in the
> test package org.apache.james.queue.activemq.
> One way to mitigate this is to set prefetch size greater than zero to make
> the timeout occur. But this would also mean that code that relies on blocking
> dequeues must be rewritten.
> What do you think?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
