[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17818431#comment-17818431
]
Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3999:
---------------------------------------
This is less a priority.
We diagnosed the notification issue that lead to this ticket to be caused by a
deployment issue.
In short we relied on specific instances: some nodes are doing JMAP, some
others IMAP/SMTP. IMAP/SMTP nodes were not applying the JMAP listeners leading
to resynchronisation issues (it was not "just" a timing issue).
However for better JMAP compliance getting a "synchronous" behaviour on
/changes is a desirable behaviour for better JMAP compliance. This had been
requested by Daniel Glutch (ltt.rs) cketti (k9 + thunderbird) and Mail Temi. I
still need to wrap my head around this and propose a patch.
> Listener: define priority and apply priority
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-3999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3999
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.8.0, 3.8.1
> Reporter: René Cordier
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.9.0
>
>
> Some listener should be executed quicklier than others.
> This is paramount to ensure best effort upon resynchronisation.
> The idea would be to prioritize in the execution order listeners that have a
> higher priority to avoid causing delays.
> JMAP listener especially (EmailQueryView, MailboxChange) should be executed
> with the highest priority possible.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
