On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Alex Wulms <alex.wu...@scarlet.be> wrote: > What are your thoughts on this subject?
I'm not Toby, but I do have some notes from the chat we had with Rusty back in January. The idea at the time was that - The 'normal' caching proxy would cache things that have good caching headers. Our crcsync smarts are not needed there. That cache has its own garbage collection logic, based on cache headers. - The crcsync proxy wants to cache "the rest" -- the formally uncacheable content, perhaps taking some decision by content type (prefer html, xml, text mimetypes. ignore others?) and its garbage collector has a very different logic (something LRU-ish?) that's a big advantage of this code being in-process with a normal caching proxy, it can ignore the stuff that the caching proxy is handling, and help with the requests that "aren't cacheable" according to their server (most requests these days, unfortunately)... cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel