On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Drake <d...@laptop.org> wrote: > As you've seen - getting this old version to build is difficult. > Getting it to run is even harder.
Yep. Was just a stab in the alternative path. Now that you've root-cause'd the issue, things look better. > I think I've found the issue: it is a client bug, now exposed through > ejabberd getting stricter: > https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-1533 > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 > > And I have an ejabberd patch to apply (attached) until we've fixed the Right, so you have a partial revert of the "strict" patch at EJAB-1434 - you plan sounds good. > Would you prefer for this fork to be named 'ejabberd' (with xs-setup > modifying the EPEL repo file to exclude ejabberd upgrades from epel), > or ejabberd-xs as before? This merits a 'release' identifier, but we're only carrying 1 patch over CentOS, and done the work to split the init script and config off to xs-config, so keeping the ejabberd name makes sense. m -- mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel