> I think it is best to leave it still compatible to JDK 1.3.1 minimum... > > not everyone has moved to JDK 1.4 due to conflict with other > applications...
my 2c (as if you care!) is that James should stay with 1.3 until a particular new piece of code cannot be written without a higher version, or until a very significant improvement in performance is achieved through the adoption of a higher version. At that point I'd expect there to be a vote by comitters, and if the time is right it will be a landslide. Up 'till now we've pretty much allowed ourselves to be vetoed by even a single well explained reason to stay with 1.3, because there hasn't been an equally compelling case to upgrade. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
