A change of connection pool is supposed to be transparent to client code.
There will be a non-transparent change in James v3, but that is simply to
provide the data source via a different mechanism (probably JNDI), instead
of Avalon.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Hutson Carspecken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 14:34
To: James Users List
Subject: Plans to Shift from Current Connection Pool to Another In Next
Version
Noel,
I wrote about the connection pool and have since done a considerable amount
of reading on the JDBC API implimentation of connection pools. Thank you, I
was farther behind than I expected.
You mentioned that JAMES is moving to another version of connection pooling.
As I would like to stay in the realm of JAMES as much as possible, could you
please elaborate on that future move?
Hut
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
