I myself, being a novice and not knowing how to deal with CVS and such, -there's no way to be able to get into any new stuff until an automated package is released... The result being that there is no testing or usage being done by the more general user.
It seems like there's been quite a few, what I would call, major changes to the system so that generally warrants the new version right? And too if you start trying to throw a bunch of "undeveloped" stuff in there then you're likely to be accused of trying to run a monopoly.. -or at least taking the same steps on that path. ;)
..how 'bout that new build with the new features for those of us who aren't professional programmers or able to tweak source code around... -we'll play with it!
LTG.CUTMAN
From: Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Versions and Builds Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:32:44 +0000
Stephen
> Would a 2.2 incorporate the updates concerning the Avalon framework > (ComponentManager --> ServiceManager) and released cornerstone content?
No, I reckoned that Roy made a good case for simply promoting the current state 2.2 to stable and cutting a release of it. I'm assuming that there aren't any showstopping defects in this branch, and that there are definitely no serious regression defects or we'd have heard about it.
I don't think we should get into a debate about the content of the release, simply provide what we already have and get some breathing space for working on v3 .
d.
_________________________________________________________________
Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN Toolbar – FREE! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
