Ahmed, I think you raise a fair point although obviously you've not completely given up on JAMES, because you still read the mailing lists...
I wonder if there is anything being done on these specific issues at the moment, this would aid me in "fighting JAMES corner" with various clients. Also, it would be interesting to hear how many people are actively working on development of JAMES at present... Thanks for your answers. On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 11:40 +0100, Ahmed Mohombe wrote: > > James is not currently actively supported/sponsored by companies > Of course there is no companies support. > Companies need stable IMAP solutions and easy to configure server > through GUIs not editing per telnet some strange config files. > None of the above features are(or were) a target of JAMES. > > Sorry but that's the reality :(. > In several companies I was, trying to bring JAMES, the first question was > about IMAP and GUI. > Most of these companies don't have years to wait till someone will implement > it in JAMES, > so they'll take an existing solution. > > Have a nice day, > > Ahmed. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Kind Regards Andrew Sykes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sykes Development Ltd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
