Am Dienstag, den 09.05.2006, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Marcello Marangio wrote: > > Cool. > > I set the max to 100 and it seems fine now, Thanks a million. > > About the bug, I am pretty sure it is related to the size of the > > "recipients" column. > > I didn't try with filesystem repositories. > > As the rfc2822 doesn't put any limit to the size of the mail address, this > > is pretty bad: the only way to support EVERY recipients size is to build the > > table as a clob and handle it in the JDBCSpoolManager class. > > Do you agree? > > We should probably use the 1000 chars limit while accepting connections > via SMTPServer and reject further recipients. > Or we could use the maxRecipient feature for this.. > If we want to suppport >1000 bytes recipients we could change the > JDBCMailRepository to store the recipient collection in the attributes > field and retrieve it from there. We won't have the plain-text > recipients in a field but we'll skip the 1000 char limit. > > This is not a difficult task but would introduce a backward > compatibility issue, so we should talk about this and alternative > solutions, first.
I agree we should try to fix it without modify the Repository. bye Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
