Which is reasonable :-)

Old config:
Windows 2K server
Java: 1.4.2_02
James 2.2.0
Driver Oracle jdbc 9
Database: Oracle 9i
Processor: Intel pIII

New Config:
Windows XP
Java: 1.4.2_02
James 2.2.0
Driver Oracle jdbc 9
Database: Oracle 9i
Processor: Intel P4 Dual Core

I was hoping in a thing like "oh, yes I had the same problem, and the
solution is :....." :-)

I'll disable the functionalities I developed and I'll try to have a "pure"
version of james working, then I'll add the stuff I made and see what
happens.

Ciao
Marcello




> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: lunedì 11 settembre 2006 17.43
> A: James Users List
> Oggetto: Re: ORA 1460 - unimplemented or unreasonable conversion requested
> 
> So you changed pc but you reinstalled the same JVM, the same OS, the
> same Oracle Server, the same Oracle JDBC driver and the same James
> version and you got an error that you never seen previously?
> 
> If so, what changed in the hardware? Same architecture? Same number of
> processors?
> 
> You know, if you changed something and then something goes wrong you
> should start saying exactly what you changed and then what you din't
> change.
> 
> So: OS, JVM version, Oracle Version, Oracle driver, james versions must
> be part of every report.
> 
> Marcello Marangio wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I'm having the Oracle error I reported in the subject.
> >
> > I couldn't get james work with this new PC, but I am pretty sure the sw
> > configuration is exactly the same as the old one.
> >
> > I get the error calling mailContext.sendMail(), which worked perfectly
> > before the PC change.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any clue?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Marcello
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to