Removing JAVA_HOME works (when I "set JAVA_HOME=" at the prompt).

When James / avalon (?) can figure out where JAVA_HOME is then it
fails to start and gives an error message.

The error says "the system cannot find the path specified".
when it sees the home as in follows:
Using JAVA_HOME:      C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_06\bin


Odd! could it have something to do with the space in the file names?
When is unix / linux going to start accepting file names with spaces
in them? it is 2008 already.

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check that the java home is correct, try with a java home without
>  spaces in the path, and try removing it again..
>  set JAVA_HOME=
>
>  Sounds like the bat script can't even start Java.
>
>  d.
>
>
>
>  On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Athar Shiraz Siddiqui
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Requesting help with installation.
>  >
>  >   Using James version 2.3.x on windows xp sp 2.
>  >   I unzip the jaf and mailapi and installed java 1.5 but then when I try
>  >   to run as follows I get the following error
>  >   --
>  >   Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
>  >   (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
>  >   C:\James\james-2.3.0\bin>run.bat
>  >   Using PHOENIX_HOME:   C:\James\james-2.3.0
>  >   Using PHOENIX_TMPDIR: C:\James\james-2.3.0\temp
>  >   Using JAVA_HOME:      C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_06\bin
>  >   The system cannot find the path specified.
>  >   --
>  >
>  >   There is nothing in log or temp directory. It just says "system cannot
>  >   find the path specified". It was working fine two days ago. I tried it
>  >   again today and got this. I removed 2.3.1 and tried it with 2.3.0 and
>  >   still the same error.
>  >
>  >   The only differences is that the last time java_home was not showing
>  >   (when it was working) and now JAVA_HOME is showing but the rest is not
>  >   working.
>  >
>  >   I was really looking forward to working with James ; have wanted to
>  >   for a long time but now this unreliability and breakdown is making me
>  >   pessimistic :( about its reliability.
>  >
>  >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to