IMHO the main advantages are support for IMAP and "native" support for virtual users/domains.
I don't think it is stable enough for production yet. I run an instance of james3 as a pilot for 2 domains on my server. But the rest of the domains that my box serves are on a 2.3.2 instance. On 25/01/2012 10:25, math math wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to use James3 in production and i have few questions about it : > > What are advantages to use James v3 vs James v2? > > Does anybody uses James Beta3 in production already? Is it stable enough or > better use James 2.3.2? > > When will final stable James 3 be released? > > Thanks, > Mat. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
