Recycle of James did not work, it is still equally using all 6 of the mail servers, even though they are at a different preference levels.
Any Ideas? Cole On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Cole Ferrier <[email protected]> wrote: > talking with our internal mail system people, all 6 servers had a priority > of 10 the last time apache James was restarted. > > Does James cache this data for the life of it running? or is there a time > to live? or? > > I will schedule a recycle of james to see if it stops using the servers > that now have a lower preference. > > Let me know if you have any ideas in the mean time. > > Cole > > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Cole Ferrier <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We have an internal mail system that has 6 MX records 3 at priority 10 >> (new servers recently added) and 3 at priority 20 (old servers that where >> previously at 10). >> >> and it appears that apache james 2.3 is sending mail to all of them about >> equally? >> >> i was instructed that it should only connect to the 20's when all of the >> 10s are unavailable? >> >> any help would be appreciated? >> >> (or is there any need to restart James? aka, how long does it cache its >> data about the MX preferences?) >> >> Cole >> > >
