Hello everyone,
I think the james 3.4.0 default configuration files are broken or the
class(es) are not interpreting the configurations correctly. I'm getting
this error on startup:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: 'priority' init parameter is
compulsory
at
org.apache.james.transport.mailets.WithPriority.lambda$init$0(WithPriority.java:54)
at java.base/java.util.Optional.orElseThrow(Optional.java:408)
at
org.apache.james.transport.mailets.WithPriority.init(WithPriority.java:54)
at org.apache.mailet.base.GenericMailet.init(GenericMailet.java:229)
at
org.apache.james.container.spring.bean.factory.mailetcontainer.MailetLoaderBeanFactory.getMailet(MailetLoaderBeanFactory.java:45)
... 29 more
and it then stopped. If I used the default configurations from 3.3, it
startups OK listening on ports 25, 110, 143, and others:
USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS
root java 29741 224 tcp4 *:22421 *:*
root java 29741 268 tcp4 127.0.0.1:52860 *:*
root java 29741 291 tcp4 *:25 *:*
root java 29741 307 tcp4 *:110 *:*
root java 29741 323 tcp4 *:143 *:*
root java 29741 324 tcp4 127.0.0.1:9999 *:*
root java 29741 325 tcp4 *:50052 *:*
Here's a diff of the configuration relating to the above error:
--- conf.3.3.0/mailetcontainer.xml 2019-05-29 08:56:41.325001000 -0700
+++ conf.3.4.0/mailetcontainer.xml 2020-03-12 12:35:52.827179000 -0700
@@ -56,7 +56,16 @@
<!-- Important check to avoid looping -->
<mailet match="RelayLimit=30" class="Null"/>
- <!-- Check attachment extensions for possible viruses -->
+ <mailet matcher="All" class="WithPriority">
+ <value>8</value>
+ </mailet>
+
+ <mailet matcher="HasPriority=8" class="Null"/>
+ <mailet matcher="AtLeastPriority=8" class="Null"/>
+ <mailet matcher="AtMostPriority=8" class="Null"/>
+
+
+ <!-- Check attachment extensions for possible viruses -->
<!-- The "-z" option requests the check to be non-recursively
applied -->
<!-- to the contents of any attached '*.zip' file. -->
<!--
Anyone experiencing other issues with James 3.4? Other than storing /
receiving mail?
Thanks,
Tommy
