>Last but not least: this is a rather technical discussion, more related >to James development, but maybe not relevant for James users. As such I >believe next time we want to discuss technical details related to James >development (which is great!) we should do it on server-dev. > No, no Benoit!
It was great to read that lucid explanation here :-) -- David Matthews [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
