Hi Inigo,
You can take some guidance from previous successful efforts to convert
existing documents into RFC 3647 format. The latest attempt was in the
Code Signing BRs conversion in May 2022. Check out the mapping document
and the comments in the ballot discussion period
<https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/2022-May/000795.html>.
For each existing section/paragraph, it would be nice to have a comment
describing where that existing language will land in the converted
document (destination). This will allow all existing text to be
accounted for.
During this process, you might encounter duplicate or redundant text
which needs to be flagged accordingly. You might also get into some
uncertainty as to which RFC3647 section is a best fit for existing text
that might require additional discussion.
I hope this helps.
Dimitris.
On 29/8/2023 12:42 μ.μ., Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg wrote:
Hi Tim,
See attached redlined and current versions. I just used what Martijn
suggested yesterday but let me know if this is what you were looking for.
Regards
*De:* Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]>
*Enviado el:* lunes, 28 de agosto de 2023 19:49
*Para:* Inigo Barreira <[email protected]>; CA/B Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List <[email protected]>
*Asunto:* RE: SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format pre-ballot
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
and know the content is safe.
Thanks for doing this Inigo … I know re-organizations like this are a
lot of work and fall very much in the category of “important but not
fun”. So thanks for taking an initial stab at this.
Is there a mapping that shows where all the original text ended up? I
think that’s going to be essential for people to be able to review
this. I did some spot checking, and your conversion looks pretty
good, but I wasn’t able to do a more detailed review without a mapping.
-Tim
*From:*Servercert-wg <[email protected]> *On Behalf
Of *Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg
*Sent:* Monday, August 28, 2023 5:20 AM
*To:* CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
<[email protected]>
*Subject:* [Servercert-wg] SC-065: Convert EVGs into RFC 3647 format
pre-ballot
Hello,
The current Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) are written in a
non-standardized format. For many years it has been discussed to
convert this document into the RFC 3647 format and follow the
standardized model for this type of documents.
Given that this has been known for several years, I have prepared the
following ballot text, which converts the EVGs into the RFC 3647 format:
EVGs based on RFC3647 by barrini · Pull Request #440 ·
cabforum/servercert (github.com)
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furl.avanan.click%2Fv2%2F___https%3A%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fpull%2F440___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoyOGIxNWVhZGVmZDlkZTM0NjQzZTA3YTlmYTA2MzM5YTo2OmExZWM6NGZmMGEzM2U0ZWZjOTU4MTM1NWRkNjU3ZDE5YjU3Y2YxNzg1NWU0ZTVjYzkzY2NjM2M0MWU5MzEyYzJmZTQ0NzpoOkY&data=05%7C01%7CInigo.Barreira%40sectigo.com%7C4655b36856d14b027ddd08dba7ef14dd%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C638288417510201658%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i1mj1jzUMz%2FaDm9W5yeEhB84VTHTNf%2FL8apVOzMQx04%3D&reserved=0>
I am currently seeking two endorsers as well as any feedback on the
ballot content itself (wording, effective dates, etc.).
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
