Significantly better, thank you.

 

-Tim

 

From: Aaron Gable <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 1:42 PM
To: Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]>
Cc: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Seeking endorsers: Ballot SC-XX: Measure all hours 
and days to the second

 

I've simplified the phrasing further, it feels much less legalese now. Let me 
know what you think!

 

Thanks again,

Aaron

 

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 2:29 PM Tim Hollebeek <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Yes, there’s a fair amount of legal puffery in the existing BRs (and especially 
the EVGs) … it’s one of the common causes of lack of clarity, rather than 
clarity.  I’d prefer to see it slowly removed over time and replaced with 
clear, straight-forward language that’s easy for non-native speakers to read 
and comply with.  Obviously much easier said than done, though.

 

That’s one of the dangers of this sort of exercise: we tend to add words and 
nuance as if it’s making things better … but one thing I’ve slowly learned over 
the years is that more words do not necessarily lead to increased clarity.

 

-Tim

 

From: Aaron Gable <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2024 5:17 PM
To: Tim Hollebeek <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Cc: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Seeking endorsers: Ballot SC-XX: Measure all hours 
and days to the second

 

Fair enough! I was aiming for the same style of "reasonable person" as is often 
found in legal texts, since I had some concern that someone might try to use 
this phrasing to interpret "11 months" as "11 x 28 = 308 days", which would be 
a potential minimum value but not one that a reasonable person would assert. I 
welcome additional help refining this phrasing.

 

Thanks,

Aaron

 

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:59 PM Tim Hollebeek <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

You don’t want to call out “reasonableness” unless you’re actually going to let 
people use their discretion.

 

The first new sentence, as I read it, could be rewritten as: “All statements of 
time periods SHALL be taken to mean exactly that time period, and not one 
microsecond more.”

 

That is very clear, but it is not the only reasonable interpretation.  Claiming 
the “minimum” interpretation is the only “reasonable” one is a bit more 
opinionated and pejorative than is necessary.  It also doesn’t add anything.

 

-Tim

 

From: Servercert-wg <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf Of Aaron Gable via 
Servercert-wg
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2024 1:06 PM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Seeking endorsers: Ballot SC-XX: Measure all hours 
and days to the second

 

Hi all,

 

Thanks for the great discussion in the ServerCert WG call this morning!

 

I have updated this draft ballot to attempt to use Clint's language around 
interpreting time periods to be their minimum value. Please take a look!

 

https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/470/files 
<https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/470/files___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoyMjY5YTgxZDcxNTE0ZGU4YjBkZjc5ODk0ZGZiYWZjMzo2OjY5ZjY6M2RkYjVhYjI4NTY0ZTJkOTJjZGI0YWE3MmUyZTk1ZWVmZDdlZmY3Yjg5NDczOTU2MTBhZTI1ODI5YjQzY2M3MzpoOkY>
 

 

Thanks again,

Aaron

 

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 9:49 AM Aaron Gable <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Hi all,

 

As a result of this bugzilla incident 
<https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1865080___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoyMjY5YTgxZDcxNTE0ZGU4YjBkZjc5ODk0ZGZiYWZjMzo2Ojc5MDk6N2Y5OWEwNTEwYTIxNGUyZjgwY2Q0NmJiMGQyY2I4MTcxZjMwN2QwZGY2MzA3NDMwZjJhOTRmM2U4ZTZkNDg3NjpoOkY>
 , and inspired by Ballot SC-52 
<https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/327___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoyMjY5YTgxZDcxNTE0ZGU4YjBkZjc5ODk0ZGZiYWZjMzo2OjE5NGQ6ODZiZWM0ZDc1ZDI2YzRkNzM2OGIxMjFlZmY5N2UzOTU4ZjQ5NThjMGM5N2EyMGExYTE5OWIzMjc4ZGY3ZTRiYzpoOkY>
  which never came to a vote, I would like to re-propose that the Baseline 
Requirements clarify that all "hour" and "day" time periods are measured with 
1-second precision, and do not refer to calendar days. They currently do this 
in two separate places (three, if you count the definition of Short-Lived 
Certificates). I believe it will benefit all readers to instead state this 
convention once at the beginning of the document, so that it is clear that it 
applies uniformly to all time periods measured in those units.

 

The pull request can be viewed and commented on here: 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/470 
<https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/470___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoyMjY5YTgxZDcxNTE0ZGU4YjBkZjc5ODk0ZGZiYWZjMzo2OmZkOTE6ODM5YWFmMzkyYjM4OThmMTU3NmVjMjdlNTk2Y2ZjNWZhZDRmODZjOTQyNzcwY2FjMWQ3ZTU1ODRjOWU3YmRmYjpoOkY>
 

The precise diff that will become the ballot redline if no changes are 
requested can be viewed here: 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/90a98dc7c1131eaab01af411968aa7330d315b9b...c3e928e73caed8c8489ab5406127aad661b8a63e
 
<https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/90a98dc7c1131eaab01af411968aa7330d315b9b...c3e928e73caed8c8489ab5406127aad661b8a63e___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoyMjY5YTgxZDcxNTE0ZGU4YjBkZjc5ODk0ZGZiYWZjMzo2OjdjNjQ6MTI0NDAzNTNlYjI5MGE4YTcxYmEzNzFjZjRmMWU1NGQzNmYwNGZhZDk0ZGM3OWNkM2VhMDE5MWZjYjU5MTRiNTpoOkY>
 

 

I am seeking endorsers for this ballot.

 

Thank you!

Aaron

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Servercert-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Reply via email to