Disig votes "YES" on Ballot SC-078 - Subject organizationName alignment for DBA / Assumed Name
Regards Peter Miskovic -----Original Message----- From: Servercert-wg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: utorok 17. septembra 2024 15:20 To: [email protected] Subject: Servercert-wg Digest, Vol 75, Issue 25 Send Servercert-wg mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Servercert-wg digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Voting Period Begins: Ballot SC-078 - Subject organizationName alignment for DBA / Assumed Name (Martijn Katerbarg) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:19:55 +0000 From: Martijn Katerbarg <[email protected]> To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <[email protected]> Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: Ballot SC-078 - Subject organizationName alignment for DBA / Assumed Name Message-ID: <sa1pr17mb65031f92b4cb3e5f09d88c3be3...@sa1pr17mb6503.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" ?Summary The TLS Baseline Requirements currently state an OV certificate may contain either a DBA / Assumed Name or Legal Name. The EVGs and SBRs allow for the common format of "DBA (Legal Name)". This ballot aims to align the practices for OV certificates with this. While still allowing the inclusion of the sole DBA / Assumed Name, it will also allow for the "DBA (Legal Name)" format to be used, allowing CAs to align practices with the EVG and SBRs. The following motion has been proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Clint Wilson (Apple) and Enrico Entschew (D-Trust). Motion Begins MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") based on Version 2.0.7 as specified in the following redline: https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/ba28d04894d69c8fac62850b9d0de5061658c7c5...d69373c35ff72121a912b69b060ff89f32d41383 <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fservercert%2Fcompare%2Fba28d04894d69c8fac62850b9d0de5061658c7c5...d69373c35ff72121a912b69b060ff89f32d41383&data=05%7C02%7Cmartijn.katerbarg%40sectigo.com%7C1bdc97410> Motion Ends This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows: Discussion (at least 7 days) * Start time: 2024-09-10 13:00 UTC * End time: 2024-09-17 13:20 UTC Vote for approval (7 days) * Start time: 2024-09-17 13:20 UTC * End time: 2024-09-24 13:20 UTC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20240917/0e594360/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 8254 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/attachments/20240917/0e594360/attachment.bin> ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Servercert-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg ------------------------------ End of Servercert-wg Digest, Vol 75, Issue 25 ********************************************* _______________________________________________ Servercert-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg
