It would be helpful for us if you share here. Regards, Awel
--- In [email protected], "JP Morgenthal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ron, > I have what you're looking for. Contact me offline to discuss. > > JP > ------Original Message------ > From: Ronald Schmelzer > Sender: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > ReplyTo: [email protected] > Sent: Sep 15, 2005 12:38 PM > Subject: Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: ZapThink needs help: Samplecontracts? > > Yes, I made that point in my email. WSDL is not sufficient to describe > functional and non-functional requirements in the contract. If it was, I > wouldn't need to ask for examples ;) So, now I'm asking the question: > does ANYONE have examples for real-world Service Contracts? > > Jason and I have been pounding the ground on this question for about 3 > weeks now in different forums, and it seems that remarkably, there are > very few, if any, real-world examples of Service contracts other than > the aforementioned, but drastically insufficient WSDL. > > So - once again - this is the time for those on this board to show their > mettle. Anyone have any real-world Service contracts that handle > non-functional and functional requirements? We've got lots of theorists, > pundits, and advisors on this group, but where are the practical > implementers? > > Ron > > Awel Dico wrote: > > > Hi Ron; > > > > I agree that WSDL is not sufficient to provide all metadata > > associated with security, semantics, QoS, SlA ..etc. I don't think > > WSDL is supposed to provide those semantics either. As for security > > within the SOA context, the message level security that can be > > defined in SOAP headers (as defined in WS-security) is not > > sufficient. The SOA infrastructure needs to provide another level of > > security, such as authorizing the client, for the access of the > > service (i.e. before sending the actual soap request - client > > request is accepted only after the autorization is passed and > > --------------------------------- > JP Morgenthal > Managing Partner, Avorcor, Inc. > Phone: (703) 648-1520 > Cell: (703) 554-5301 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Note: Please note new email address. Ethink Systems is now Avorcor, Inc. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
