|
Anne: You are perfectly right. The composition
is a pretty important facet and central to bridging between different varieties
of Policy and WS-Policy defines that well. One attempt at a namespace for defining
assertions on The WSM vendors definitely all need to
define the internal facet of
policy (configuration) since they all provide agents. There is not a
whole lot of reason to do that in a standards compliant manner in the short
term. The external
facet is much more standard sensitive and there is little reason to
do this unless this
is done in a standards compliant fashion. From: Anne Thomas
Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WS-Policy defines a
framework for composing policy assertions, but it does not define standard
policy assertion languages. On 11/29/05, "WS-Policy/Policy
Attachment and its Assertions do a great job in "composing"
Assertions especially ones that are external. Others such as synapse rules XML
will be used for "composing" aspects that are internal" The
language here is expressed within WS-Policy/Policy Attachment; the agent here
could be Apache Synapse. From: Logan, Patrick D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"An SPONSORED
LINKS
YAHOO!
GROUPS LINKS
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] RE: SOA Gover... Sanjiva Weerawarana
- RE: [service-orientated-architecture] RE: SOA ... Rajesh Koilpillai
- RE: [service-orientated-architecture] RE: SOA ... Mukund Balasubramanian
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] RE: ... Anne Thomas Manes
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: SOA ... William Henry
- RE: [service-orientated-architecture] RE: SOA ... Mukund Balasubramanian
- RE: [service-orientated-architecture] RE: SOA ... Mukund Balasubramanian
