|
Todd, The
what/how discussion is relatively moot when you consider that the words
following each of those in both of our descriptions are the same (e.g. something
needs to get done and something needs a way to get done). I believe our thoughts
about processes and services are aligned there. I
agree with your belief that eminent domain is not going to happen, especially
in large, established organizations. The micro view seems to be the most
approachable right now, but I am concerned that some companies will be hindered
by the lack of cohesion on the SOA concept. Seems a lot of people are
selling something concrete here, when it’s really about strategy. JP From: The part that didn't sit right with me was the line before the one you
called out. I feel that the process defines how something gets
done, and the service defines more of what is being done. The
problem with going to the "plan" metaphor is that SOA does not equal
EA. To me, SOA merely states that a core unit used in describing
the architecture is a service. Services alone are not enough. To
use the city planning analogy (timely sidenote, I just posted a blog entry that
discusses the city planning analogy before reading this), SOA would just tell
me I'm going to have a retail district in these areas, a residential district
here, hospitals here and here, etc. If this is all I do, I won't have a
successful city. I need to determine what the interconnecting roads are,
the traffic patterns, power grids, etc. That spans into enterprise
architecture. I would edit the abstract so that the macro view is about
making SOA fit into the broader enterprise architecture. All of this aside, I think the subject you're trying to address is one
of the biggest challenges for IT right now. I'm working on a vision
document whose goal is to get people to understand that simply looking at
existing projects and identifying some service boundaries (your micro view)
will not yield an enterprise SOA. At the same time, using the thoughts in
my blog entry, no CxO is about to evoke eminent domain over the entire
enterprise and bulldoze it to start from a macro view. Hopefully, you'll
put some of your thoughts from the presentation up on your blog after the
talk. I'd love to see what you have to say. -tb On Jan 12, 2006, at 7:39 AM, JP Morgenthal wrote:
========= SOA: The Macro and Micro View From: I have attached a slide that I frequently
use to describe some of the basic concepts associated with SOA -- specifically
the concept of multiple applications sharing the same set of services. On 1/9/06, ballietf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has any one described SOA on one
PowerPoint slide? If so, is it
YAHOO! GROUPS
LINKS
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
