Keith, very good set of question and a challenge certainly.
I do indeed feel that WS-CDL can be used to define (in the sense of modeling it) an SOA. It is not the definition of SOA but a way to define a specific SOA that has to do something. I do feel there are some things missing, namely direct support for publish and subscribe, but that is in part to do with WSDL and it's lack of support for publish and subscribe. I hope to provide some concrete examples as to how this can be done in due course and will publish them on the www.pi4tech.com website. Best Steve T On 16 Jan 2006, at 19:56, Keith Harrison-Broninski wrote: > Steve, you are keen to promote the use of WS-CDL for SOA. So here > are some simple questions :-) > • Why do you not propose that WS-CDL could be used to define SOA? > (in the sense of model it - represent any SOA system in an abstract > way) > • If it is because you feel that WS-CDL is missing some key > ingredient(s), what are they? > • Do you think that these ingredients could in principle be > defined > formally? > • If so, do you have any idea how this could be done? > -- > > All the best > Keith > > http://keith.harrison-broninski.info > > Steve Ross-Talbot wrote:Not that I have a strictly format definition > but one might consider the >> following: > > > SPONSORED LINKS > Service-oriented architecture > Computer monitoring software > Free computer monitoring software > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > ▪ Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web. > > ▪ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ▪ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service. > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
