Eric Newcomer wrote:
> But I think we do recognize that SOA is distinct from
> its implementation in technolgy, and while it's true
> that many SOAs are based on CORBA, the use of CORBA
> per se does not equate to an SOA.
Eric, I was specifically speaking to the subtle indication in some of the
commentary here, that "distributed object systems" were chatty, or in some
other
way limited in how they could be used. There is some recuring themes that
suggest that "distributed object systems" have inherent problems in working
well
in an SOA.
As a proponent for Java and mobile code in SOA environments which Java is used
I
am concerned about the implications. The fact that Java is Object Oriented,
and
we use terms like "distributed systems" or "distributed computing" to describe
some of the attributes of an SOA, might lead some who just read about
"distributed object systems" being chatty to believe that Java might have some
inherit problems with being chatty, or otherwise unable to be tuned for a
particular service interface need.
Gregg Wonderly
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
