Todd Biske wrote:
>One thing that I advocate is for companies to embrace the fact
>that there will be no one agreed format for all interchange.
>There may be a universal model from which the actual interchange
>models can be derived, but in terms of the messages flowing
>at run time, multiple models with all of the
>redundancies they bring will be the norm.
Todd, could you elaborate a bit on this? I am not sure that I am
following you here. I thought that the point would be to have a common
agreed upon format. Or is this more along the lines of Single
Service/Multiple Contracts?
Regards,
- Anil
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
