On 2/23/06, Jan Algermissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I cannot figure out, what it means that an interface is "well
> defined". Especially I do not understand what an interface is that is
> *not* well defined.
>
> Can someone shed some light on this?
IMO, it's well defined if it's self-descriptive. WSDL, WS-Policy,
RDF, etc.. won't help as a descriptive framework if what is being
described is entirely proprietary, e.g. proprietary operations,
proprietary data formats, proprietary QoS descriptions, ...
Self-descriptive means everything is standardized.
Mark.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
