On Apr 20, 2006, at 11:12 AM, stilkov wrote:

> Obviously, there's lots of political aspects. But there's also a 
> gazillion tools, methods,
> documents, and knowledge that deal with information management and 
> business
> intelligence. I have serious doubts that any XML-based technology 
> will even have the
> chance to reach that level of maturity anytime soon. It's always 
> going to have to catch up
> with the relational world, at least in the domain of business 
> intelligence. Especially with
> regards to data warehousing, reporting, OLAP, etc.  ...

It appears as the relational model being unbeatable i  the DWH 
domain, OTH I would be really curious how DWH technology based on RDF 
would work given the same amount of research as done for the rel. 
model. Especially since RDF removes that inherent need for 
intensional typing.

XML I think is simply unsuitable for the DWH domain....the data 
structure is just too complex.

(Sorry for going off topic a bit)

Jan


>
> --
> Stefan Tilkov, http://www.innoq.com/blog/st/
>
> --- In [email protected], Jan 
> Algermissen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> The question propably is how to break the tyranny of the Relational
>> Data Model in general, at least at the application-to-application
>> level. Relational thinking is so ubiquitous that I doubt it ever
>> occurs to the vast mojority of IT staff that data modeling and data
>> access can also be done on the basis of quite different paradigms
>> (e.g. XML, RDF or service interfaces). And worse: usually it is
>> simply a non-option even to think about taking that direct SQL access
>> away from them. And often not even if they already experienced large-
>> scale coupling on the database schema with changes to the scheme
>> being calculated in man years.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>





SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to