> ...the Java platform... requires a different API for each type of
> middleware/communication pattern.

I would like to see the JMS API get an update, e.g. to incorporate
features the vendors have been proving out on their own.

I think the Java community as a whole has been doing a good bit of API
development, e.g. Spring, Pico, etc. Indigo may inspire more coherency
across API's. There have been articles published on making JMS easier
to use by wrapping a Stream API around them, by mitigating JNDI setup
with Spring, etc.

> Microsoft's Windows Communication Foundation (aka "Indigo")?

Has Indigo proven itself yet? When will it ship? How does Indigo
compare to JMS for queues and pub/sub? Does it support those models
directly, or try to hide them? Which approach is better?

I think there is a lot to learn and once MSFT gets Indigo into
production we can find out more.

-Patrick








SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to