> Let me correct myself and say "transfer" protocol instead of transport. Utimately, they're a way of moving bits with various differences in reliability, performance, available message exchange patterns, schemes to describe resources.
That's not the case, Stu. Transport protocols move bits, transfer
protocols don't. Transfer protocols are used atop transport protocols
for this reason.
Try looking at it this way; a trans*fer* protocol is to a trans*port*
protocol, as a supplier agreement is to a delivery truck. That is,
transport only gets the goods to the door, while the
agreement/contract gets them *in* the door.
Mark.
SPONSORED LINKS
| Computer software | Computer aided design software | Computer job |
| Soa | Service-oriented architecture |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
