> whether they are using HTTP as a "transport" or "transfer" protocol,
> they care if it gets the job done. They'll happily use
> WS-Addressing if it is useful for something they do care about in
> their architecture, whether or not it is the worst offender from the
> web architecture perspective.
So WS-* is good because, although it is complex and developers don't
understand or care about it, eventually there will be tools enough to
hide it from them?
Nice argument. I'm almost so numb as to be convinced.
-Patrick
SPONSORED LINKS
| Computer software | Computer aided design software | Computer job |
| Soa | Service-oriented architecture |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
