> The point is not satisfying or not - it is not a "one size fits all world." As Mark points out he prefers one way. Others prefer another. You can argue endlessly (as people have, do, and will) about whether one preference is "right" or "better" somehow than another, or you can just be practical, like Amazon (apparently at least) and provide both.
I hope you didn't mean to imply that seeking out a "better" solution
isn't practical, Eric! 8-O
The Web provides for more loosely coupled services than does "Web
services", because, as we've discussed before here, the Web cleanly
separates interface from implementation. If loose coupling is
important to you, then it seems the Web *is* probably "better".
Cheers,
Mark.
SPONSORED LINKS
| Computer software | Computer aided design software | Computer job |
| Soa | Service-oriented architecture |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
