> modelling with Topic Maps is essentially equivalent to the set of
> data sets suitable for modelling with RDF
That's my understanding, although I have not paid too much attention
to either one. These are essentially data structures for describing
data structures.
Back in the 80's I found myself caught up in an earlier
frenzy... today it is SOA. Back then it was AI and Expert Systems. I
was a Lisp programmer (think XML today) in an AI lab (think Semantic
Web) using Semantic Networks (think lists of terms that describe other
lists of terms)...
There is little if any significant difference between Semantic Nets,
Topic Maps, and RDF trips.
I should have written a book, the title could have been
"Semantic-Orient or Be Doomed".
-Patrick
SPONSORED LINKS
| Computer software | Computer aided design software | Computer job |
| Soa | Service-oriented architecture |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
