One factor that Tim misses is "business demand". No matter how cool a technology might be, it will never get adopted if it doesn't address a painful business problem aching to be solved.

His matrix also doesn't accommodate the idea that a disruptive innovation could potentially destroy and otherwise winning technology. (I'm hesitant to say that CORBA would ever have been a winning technology, but I don't think it would have been quite the spectacular loser that it is if J2EE and the Web hadn't happened.)

Anne

On 6/21/06, Jan Algermissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Jun 21, 2006, at 8:54 PM, Eric Newcomer wrote:

> At the end of the day these "my technology is better than your
> technology" arguments often fail to address a key point, which is
> how standards gain adoption.
>


__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to