|
Patrick,
What I
mean is: if the sender is unable to transmit message(s) (over HTTP), it
will persist the message(s) locally and retry at regular intervals to
transmit the message. The receiver at its end will keep state to filter
duplicate messages.
In
case of WS-RM (RX), it should be possible to maintain the Sequence and
related information on some durable storage mechanism (database, file,
...). And not only in memory as quite a few WS-RM implementations are
doing.
Nice
examples of such persistent protocols.are ebMS, RNIF (RosettaNet), EDIINT AS2
and so. Persistency is unspecified in the WS-RM and WS-ReliableMessaging
Policy specs.
Kind
regards, Guy Crets
__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [service-orientated-archit... Steve Jones
- Re: [service-orientated-archit... Jan Algermissen
- Re: [service-orientated-archit... Gregg Wonderly
- Re: [service-orientated-archit... Stuart Charlton
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: S... Stuart Charlton
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] R... Steve Jones
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: SOA Refer... Anne Thomas Manes
- [service-orientated-architecture] Re: SOA Refer... patrickdlogan
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: S... Eric Newcomer
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: SOA R... Stefan Tilkov
- RE: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: SOA Reference ... Guy Crets
- [service-orientated-architecture] Re: SOA Reference... patrickdlogan
- [service-orientated-architecture] Re: SOA Reference Arch... Udi Dahan
