Patrick,
 
What I mean is: if the sender is unable to transmit message(s) (over HTTP), it will persist the message(s) locally and retry at regular intervals to transmit the message.  The receiver at its end will keep state to filter duplicate messages.
 
In case of WS-RM (RX), it should be possible to maintain the Sequence and related information on some durable storage mechanism (database, file, ...).  And not only in memory as quite a few WS-RM implementations are doing.
 
Nice examples of such persistent protocols.are ebMS, RNIF (RosettaNet), EDIINT AS2 and so.  Persistency is unspecified in the WS-RM and WS-ReliableMessaging Policy specs.
 
Kind regards, Guy Crets
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of patrickdlogan
Sent: woensdag 28 juni 2006 0:56
To: [email protected]
Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: SOA Reference Architecture

> But what we need most, also inside the corporate firewalls, is real
> queued (persistent) messaging over HTTP.

Could you explain more what you mean by "queued (persistent)
messaging"?

These terms could have several "nuances".

-Patrick

__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to