Jan Algermissen wrote: > Ron et al., > > not sure if this is helpful, but, making my last comment the other > way round, one could also say that a uniform interface is indeed > insufficient if you think in terms of *services* having that > interface. If you want to use a uniform interface you have to expose > the (existence of the) individual objects (e.g. the lightbulbs) > because the method calls apply to these objects, not to the services. > > Does that help?
The URI for your resource is exposing the operation. The payload of the PUT requires an indication of which lightbulb should be manipulated, or the URI must contain this information. Either way, the user has to 'know' the name of the object right? Gregg Wonderly ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
