Gervas Douglas wrote: > --- In [email protected], "Alexander > Johannesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Because it's ... dumb? :) Any language is good or bad depending on the >>hands that yields it. Leveraging your user-base on the languages you >>support can only mean more of what you've already got, both good *and* >>bad. Saying things like (I forget who; someone up the post-chain) >>"JavaScript is really bad for collaborative projects" just >>demonstrates this persons bad experiences with it. I've got some good >>ones. So what? >> >>Nah, languages isn't really what we should be discussing ; it's all >>about overall design and architecture.
>I seem to remember founding this Group to discuss principally >service-orientated architecture. >There is no reason why people should not discuss languages in that they >relate to SOA, >especially Descriptive Languages. There are many different programming languages and associated platforms which facilitate better SOA designs than others. Discussions in that direction seem to be vital to me! SOA is not just about how you pass information. It's about why you pass the information you are passing and how useful it is in the form you are passing. Which users of that data have which issues with its use etc. Gregg Wonderly ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
