Steve,
this comes as a surprise to me: Typically, folks really DO consider BPEL as a language for orchestrations... What am I missing?
----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Ashley at Metamaxim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [email protected]
Gesendet: Sonntag, den 23. Juli 2006, 23:51:16 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Orchestration, Choreography, and Composition
Von: Ashley at Metamaxim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [email protected]
Gesendet: Sonntag, den 23. Juli 2006, 23:51:16 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Orchestration, Choreography, and Composition
Steve wrote:
> However we may need to be a little careful it thinking that WS-BPEL
> defines orchestration. I do not think it should do so and would not
> suggest going down that path.
> defines orchestration. I do not think it should do so and would not
> suggest going down that path.
Steve: I would be interested to know why you think that WS-BPEL is not a suitable medium for defining orchestration.
Thanks
Ashley
SPONSORED LINKS
| Computer software | Computer security software | Computer software program |
| Computer fax software | Computer virus software | Discount computer software |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
