I think you may well mitunderstand what I meant although I can see why you might think it from what I wrote.
What I mean that the term "orchestration" should not be defined as being what WS-BPEL does and only what WS-BPEL does. "Orchestration" is wider than WS-BPEL. One may say that WS-BPEL is an example of orchestration but one should not say it the other way around. Cheers Steve T On 23 Jul 2006, at 22:51, Ashley at Metamaxim wrote: > Steve wrote: > > > However we may need to be a little careful it thinking that WS-BPEL > > defines orchestration. I do not think it should do so and would not > > suggest going down that path. > > Steve: I would be interested to know why you think that WS-BPEL is not > a suitable medium for defining orchestration. > > Thanks > Ashley > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
