Oh no, here we go again with the "Spaghetti" qualifier! Spaghetti was used in the past to depict application integration before EAI (and SOA).
I think SOA is about managing the Spaghetti and not removing the Spaghetti. The biggest the Spaghetti, the bigger the need for a SOA. I just hope people will not equate SOA = Spaghetti-Oriented Architecture now. Robin --- In [email protected], "Gervas Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > These statistics vary wildly, and lead one to conclude that SOA must > be in the eye of the beholder, because one company's "SOA" may be, in > someone else's view, a Spaghetti-Oriented Architecture or "JBOWS" > (Just a bunch of Web services). > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
