Stefen,
ESB doesn't require using different protocols. I could use an ESB to
service-enable each technology you've mentioned. In other words,
ESB may be used as the "some product" you've mentioned.
I think it's a matter of deciding on how to use an ESB (e.g. using
multiple protocols or a single protocol) and selecting an ESB that
has adapters for the the required technologies.
H.Ozawa
Stefan Tilkov wrote:
> On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:51 PM, Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
>
> > +1.
> > But many times you don't have the luxury of homogeneous systems.
> >
> > Anne
> >
> Anne, you are right, of course, but I wonder if even then an ESB is
> the right concept.
>
> For example, in a company there may be CICS/COBOL, CORBA/C++, EJB,
> and .NET services. In this example, I can either
>
> (1) select an ESB that supports all of these
> (2) for each technology, select some product that service-enables it
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
