Eric Newcomer wrote: > Yes, this does sound a lot like a whitepaper trying to make the case > for a specific product. > > Performance is very important, and we at IONA have been doing high > performance SOA for a long time based on CORBA. I personally tell clients that CORBA is not generally considered a reasonable base technology for SOA because it tightly couples the client to the server data model. I'm not aware of any way around this - am I missing something?
One of the major justifications I give for the widespread use of XML as the basis for message exchange in SOA is that the XML structure provides decoupling between client and server data structures - each end is free to work with the XML messages as they want, without concern over how the other end works. That seems to me to be an important criteria for SOA services. - Dennis -- Dennis M. Sosnoski SOA, Web Services, and XML Training and Consulting http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz Seattle, WA +1-425-296-6194 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
