Steve Jones wrote:
> On 06/11/06, shashank d. jha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> ...
>>>
>> So you mean to suggest SOA has global scope? and It is more of a
>> management protocol than of aligning IT to its business goal?
>>
>
> Its hard to imagine how you can align IT to the business without
> considering management, governance, lifecycle, funding and all the
> other elements that go with it. If you are aligning to the business
> goal then this means that you are delivering against that goal, which
> means you are managing towards that goal. The SOA RM also however
> covers how business can be viewed as services independently of IT, so
> IT alignment is only one possible outcome.
>
> SOA isn't just about management, but management is implicit in decent SOA.
If this is truly the case then the acronym should be changed.
Architecture is not management, and "aligning IT to the business" has
nothing to do with architecture and everything to do with business
management.
- Dennis
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
