And of course Oriented could also be taken to have a greater degree of acceptence for globalised markets, given that it could also be read as "an architecture of services from the orient"
I'll get my coat. On 22/11/06, Nick Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Sorry if this has been discussed before. I checked the welcome message and the whitepapers sections to see if there was a FAQ for this group, but didn't see one. If this HAS been asked before, perhaps putting the answer in the Welcome message or a FAQ would make sense.] Why is this group named service-orienTATed-architecture (Google #:134K) instead of the more common service-orienTed-architecture (Google #: 13.6M)? Is it a British spelling thing? -- Nick
